AML & Financial-Crime Technology

Research AML software the way regulators expect you to buy it.

Structured vendor profiles, capability-by-capability comparisons, and procurement guidance for compliance teams evaluating screening, monitoring, KYC, and case management technology. Facts are sourced; unknowns are marked as unverified.

Browse by category

All categories →
  1. Software category

    AML Transaction Monitoring

    Systems that monitor customer transactions against detection rules and models to surface suspicious activity for investigation.
    3 products
  2. Software category

    Customer Risk Rating

    Tools that score customers for money-laundering risk at onboarding and on an ongoing basis.
    3 products
  3. Software category

    Customer & Entity Screening

    Screening of customers and related parties against sanctions, PEP, and other watchlists at onboarding and in ongoing cycles.
    10 products
  4. Software category

    Sanctions Screening

    Screening focused specifically on sanctions lists and sanctioned-ownership exposure.
    4 products
  5. Software category

    PEP Screening

    Identification of politically exposed persons, their relatives and close associates, and heads of international organizations.
    4 products
  6. Software category

    Adverse Media Screening

    Screening customers against negative news and reputational-risk media.
    4 products
  7. Software category

    Payment Screening

    Real-time screening of payment messages against sanctions and other lists before release.
    4 products
  8. Software category

    AML Case Management

    Investigation workspaces that manage alerts, cases, SAR/STR filings, and audit trails.
    3 products
  9. Software category

    KYC & Identity Verification

    Verification of customer identity, documents, and beneficial ownership during onboarding.
    3 products
  10. Software category

    Screening & Risk-Intelligence Data

    Providers of the sanctions, PEP, adverse media, and ownership data that screening systems consume.
    4 products

Recently verified products

Compare products →

BriteBase

BriteBase Screening System

A financial-crime screening system for sanctions, PEP, RCA, HIO, and adverse-media risk, combining contextual entity resolution, alert triage, and evidence-backed case workflows.

PricingNot publicly disclosedSource status

ComplyAdvantage

Mesh Customer Screening

A configurable customer-screening workflow for people, companies, and other entities that checks sanctions, watchlist, PEP, and adverse-media data during onboarding and ongoing monitoring.

PricingNot publicly disclosedSource status

Dow Jones Risk & Compliance

RiskCenter Advanced Screening & Monitoring

A screening and continuous-monitoring platform for assessing customers, third parties, suppliers, individuals, and companies against structured risk data and adverse-media sources.

PricingNot publicly disclosedSource status

Eastnets

SafeWatch Screening

A sanctions-screening platform for checking transactions, files, databases, customer profiles, and messages against watchlists through online and offline workflows.

PricingNot publicly disclosedSource status

Feedzai

AML Transaction Monitoring

An AML transaction-monitoring solution that uses rules and machine learning to identify suspicious patterns and prioritize alerts for investigators.

PricingNot publicly disclosedSource status

Fenergo

Know Your Customer (KYC)

An API-first SaaS KYC solution for managing due diligence across the client lifecycle, including configurable client risk assessments, continuous risk monitoring, and integrated screening workflows.

PricingNot publicly disclosedSource status

Evidence-led evaluation

Structured, not sponsored

Every profile uses the same fields and the same editorial standard. Placement is never sold, and our disclosure policy governs any commercial relationship.

Verification you can see

Facts carry sources and verification dates. Anything we could not verify from public information is labeled "not publicly disclosed" instead of guessed.

Built for procurement

Comparison tables follow consistent criteria per category, so evaluations map directly onto RFP requirements instead of marketing claims.